RFI Newsletter Articles
Filter by topic
- ACMF 1
- AI 1
- ASEAN 3
- ASEAN Taxonomy 2
- Banking Supervision 1
- Blue Economy 2
- Blue Finance Challenge 1
- COP28 3
- Carbon Credits 1
- Central Asia 1
- Climate Disclosures 1
- Climate Mitigation 1
- Climate Risk 13
- Climate Scenario Analysis 1
- Climate Stress Test 1
- Coal Phase-Out 1
- Credit Ratings 1
- ESG 5
- Emerging Markets 10
- Emissions Intensity 1
- Ethical Finance 1
- FinTech 1
- Financed Emissions 2
- Financed Emissions Data 6
- Financial Institutions 9
- Financial Mateirality 1
- GCC 2
- GHG Protocol 1
- GVI Hub 3
- Global Stocktake 1
- Green Bonds 2
- Greenwashing 1
- ISSB 1
- Institutional Investors 1
- Islamic Banking 3
- Just Transition 2
- MAS 1
- MENA 2
- MSMEs 1
- NGFS 2
- Nature Risk 3
- Nature-Related Disclosures 2
- Net Zero 5
- OIC 3
- Paris Agreement 2
- Portfolio Decarbonization 3
- Refintiv 1
- Responsible Finance 3
- Risk Management 1
- SBTi 2
ICMA sustainable sukuk guidance brings flexibility and risks for issuers with limited green assets
The International Capital Markets Association (ICMA), Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) and LSEG have released guidance on sustainable sukuk, reflecting the growing contribution of Islamic capital markets to the wider sustainable fixed-income market.
Through the first quarter of this year, sustainability-labelled sukuk have been dominated by core Islamic finance jurisdictions including Malaysia, Indonesia, the UAE, Saudi Arabia and the IsDB, but the new guidance has been purposely developed for issuers coming from either sukuk or green bond markets to issue green, social, sustainable, transition or blue sukuk.
One of the areas on which the guidance is silent is the ESG/sustainability evaluation of the underlying asset, which is a structural difference between sukuk and bonds. The absence of guidance on ESG/sustainability screening of the underlying asset similar to what is required for the ultimate use-of-proceeds presents an area of risk that could be mitigated with clearer disclosure.
Even as it represents a risk to the sustainable credentials of the transaction if the asset's sustainability profile differs from investor expectations, it could be easily addressed with additional disclosure. This would mitigate the risks while providing flexibility for green and social sukuk where lack of green assets would otherwise create a barrier to issuers, especially in markets where a substantial share of financial assets are held by Shari'ah sensitive investors and financial institutions.
Banks in the GCC region are tackling climate transition risk, but it remains a ‘work-in-progress’
Standard & Poor’s Ratings has this week addressed frequently asked questions about climate transition risk facing banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, describing banks’ efforts in measuring the risk to date as a ‘work-in-progress’. On financed emissions, like those covered by RFI Foundation’s financed emissions database, S&P highlighted that “banks' difficulties with measuring scope 3 emissions come up regularly in our discussions”. This is understandable because emissions measurement is an almost universal challenge for banks globally.
This context of data gaps was a motivating factor for the way RFI undertook its financed emissions work, which is catalogued in an open-access database with five years of data covering banks and financial markets in the six GCC countries and five other OIC markets. The financial sector plays a key role in financing the transition and will need substantial new capabilities beyond what they have now to understand the many types of climate transition risk they face from the activities they finance.