RFI Newsletter Articles
Filter by date
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
Filter by topic
- ACMF 1
- AI 3
- ASEAN 3
- ASEAN Taxonomy 2
- Banking Supervision 1
- Biodiversity 2
- Blue Economy 3
- Blue Finance 1
- Blue Finance Challenge 1
- COP28 3
- CSRD 2
- Carbon Credits 1
- Central Asia 1
- Climate 1
- Climate Disclosures 6
- Climate Mitigation 4
- Climate Risk 23
- Climate Scenario Analysis 3
- Climate Stress Test 3
- Climate risk 1
- Coal Phase-Out 1
- Credit Ratings 1
- Derisking 3
- ESG 6
- Emerging Markets 14
- Emissions Intensity 1
- Ethical Finance 1
- FinTech 3
- Financed Emissions 6
- Financed Emissions Data 7
- Financial Institutions 9
- Financial Materiality 1
- Financial Shocks 1
- Financial Stability 2
- GCC 2
- GHG Protocol 1
- GVI Hub 3
- Global Stocktake 1
- Green Bonds 3
- Greenwashing 2
- ISSB 1
- Institutional Investors 1
- Islamic Banking 3
- Islamic finance 3
- Just Transition 6
- MAS 1
- MENA 2
- MSMEs 1
- Maqasid 1
- NGFS 3
Financial Institutions May Be Lulled Into Complacency By Climate Stress Test Results
The UK’s Institute & Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) says users of climate risk models may put too much weight on the results of scenarios selected for regulatory stress tests
Financial institutions should use a diversity of climate scenarios, both quantitative and qualitative, to ensure that the outputs are consistent with the economic implications of physical climate impacts in a ‘hot house’ world
Many models using traditional economic modeling applied to climate change scenarios produce overly benign results that significantly understate the true risk that financial institutions face
As Regulators Take Stock On Transition Plans, Financial Institutions Should Begin Their Own Planning
The NGFS released a Phase 1 stock take of the use of transition plans for micro-prudential supervision and laying out next steps
Transition plans for non-financial companies are substantially different than what financial institutions will prepare, and most of the finance industry is underprepared as regulators begin to probe ways to use them
Regulators and supervisors will place particular emphasis on making sure less resourced financial institutions in emerging & developing markets are able to effectively plan their role in transition
Climate Disclosures Heighten The Risk To Companies That Aren’t Planning Financing For Their Transitions Today
High-emissions companies already face less appetite from banks to lend to them, according to a study by BIS researchers using data on Japanese banks
Greater regulation on climate disclosures, especially for companies in Islamic markets, is going to increase the scopes of emissions that impact bank evaluations of companies’ climate risks
Increasing physical risk outcomes that hurt banks’ financial strength will amplify the impact of more and better disclosures of emissions
The new ASEAN Taxonomy incorporates a ‘coal phase-out’ classification to support more transition finance
The second version of the ASEAN Taxonomy outlines the conceptual framework in more detail about how countries at widely varying levels of economic development can align taxonomies under a regional framework
The ‘coal phase-out’ plan is one of the most eagerly awaited in light of prominent initiatives like the Energy Transition Mechanism and Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) that progressed during Indonesia’s presidency of the G20
As ASEAN member states adopt their own taxonomies, the practical challenges for the financial sector to navigate diverse national taxonomies and align with the ASEAN Taxonomy will be a challenging element as the region makes investment in the climate transition