RFI Newsletter Articles
Filter by date
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
Filter by topic
- ACMF 1
- AI 3
- ASEAN 3
- ASEAN Taxonomy 2
- Banking Supervision 1
- Biodiversity 2
- Blue Economy 3
- Blue Finance 1
- Blue Finance Challenge 1
- COP28 3
- CSRD 2
- Carbon Credits 1
- Central Asia 1
- Climate 1
- Climate Disclosures 6
- Climate Mitigation 4
- Climate Risk 23
- Climate Scenario Analysis 3
- Climate Stress Test 3
- Climate risk 1
- Coal Phase-Out 1
- Credit Ratings 1
- Derisking 3
- ESG 6
- Emerging Markets 14
- Emissions Intensity 1
- Ethical Finance 1
- FinTech 3
- Financed Emissions 6
- Financed Emissions Data 7
- Financial Institutions 9
- Financial Materiality 1
- Financial Shocks 1
- Financial Stability 2
- GCC 2
- GHG Protocol 1
- GVI Hub 3
- Global Stocktake 1
- Green Bonds 3
- Greenwashing 2
- ISSB 1
- Institutional Investors 1
- Islamic Banking 3
- Islamic finance 3
- Just Transition 6
- MAS 1
- MENA 2
- MSMEs 1
- Maqasid 1
- NGFS 3
Short-term climate scenarios can provide an input to help rewire the financial system
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) has released its first short-term climate scenarios. These are designed as a tool to evaluate the impact of climate change on the financial sector over a period that is in line with the policy and planning horizons for most businesses and governments.
The dynamic of climate change as a source of economic and financial risk did not emerge naturally. It arose as a result of two hundred years of historical emissions, and the process of generating those emissions involved significantly unequal sharing of the benefits. For the process of addressing the impacts of climate change, the costs should be similarly skewed towards developed countries to produce an equitable outcome for humanity.
Although there are some limitations of short-term climate scenarios in capturing the most likely outcome, they can be useful if users acknowledge the limitations and don’t allow their expectations of future climate risk to be anchored to either the most optimistic or pessimistic scenarios. These tools also shouldn’t be used in a vacuum because they could create unintended consequences for OIC markets and other emerging & developing markets by inhibiting flows of investment and climate finance that are already insufficient.
If short-term scenario analysis is instead viewed as a way to prioritise projects based on their ability to mitigate climate change, support the transition or invest in adaptation, then it may be able to play a more constructive role. The efforts to ‘rewire finance’ will still be necessary to reduce barriers to the flow of finance to OIC markets and others that are EMDEs, and efforts to improve the realism of outcomes covered by short-term climate scenarios will be more fruitful in directing capital where it can be most effective.
Making sustainability work for OIC financial institutions & Islamic finance
Systemiq Ltd. released a “Blue Whale Inquiry” seeking to combine insights into the current challenges facing sustainability gathered from 50 leaders. The resulting report outlines a range of changes across business, governments, NGOs and the financial sector to reinvigorate sustainability for the next stage of advancement towards global goals. It also includes a frank discussion of the challenges, but also potential breakthrough areas where past efforts could bear fruit even in an environment full of headwinds.
For the financial sector, three of the key catalysts highlighted are breaking the hold of short-term financial returns on decision-making, leadership among the Global South countries through adoption and delivery on more sustainable economic models, and the use of technology including AI to avoid “being trapped in an acronym-heavy compliance regime” that has developed within ESG.
For financial institutions in OIC markets seeing recalibration of externally imposed sustainability disclosure standards, there may be value in concentrating efforts on practices that provide a better balance between investor expectations and other stakeholder needs. For Islamic Finance, the greatest opportunity may lie in leaning into the discussion of ethics that other financial sector stakeholders are wary of tackling. It may be more advantageous to be able to talk authentically about ‘just’ outcomes as the economy-wide climate transition accelerates, as our planetary debts come due.
Blue finance could make a meaningful contribution to the SDGs
Blue bonds could cover 10% of the funding needed for SDG14 – which is partly focused on protecting life in the oceans – by 2030, according to a report by SystemIQ. Blue finance has received far less attention than green finance, the broader category of finance of which it is often considered a subset, but has grown meaningfully since the first blue bond was issued in 2018 by the government of Seychelles.
Among the regions in focus in the report, MENAT is notable because it has not seen any issued blue bonds to date, although Egypt is expected to follow a previous green bond issuance with a debut blue bond. There are many promising types of blue finance that could be used across the MENAT region. This is a key part of the global shipping market, including within it the Suez Canal in Egypt and the Jebel Ali port in the UAE (one of the world’s dozen largest ports by volume).
There are challenges in linking together the co-benefits from investing sustainably in one sector of the blue economy with other investments in other ocean-related sectors, but a lot of opportunities as well. Seeing a focus placed on opportunities for blue bonds and other forms of blue finance across the MENAT region and Asia – which includes many OIC countries – should be a call to action to consider blue finance among other developing approaches to responsible finance by financial institutions within these markets.
The RFI Foundation is involved in coordinating an “Oceans Flagship Laboratory” announced during COP 28 which is a part of the BC100+ initiative focusing on blockchain and the SDGs. The Oceans Flagship Laboratory is working to explore the role of technology to increase flows of blue finance, particularly within the MENAT region. Contact us for more information.
Islamic finance is creating opportunities to provide leadership in responsible finance
The Islamic finance market has demonstrated impressive growth in recent decades, with several waves of growth propelled by different global trends. There has been increasing convergence with the development of responsible finance that has occurred over the decade since the agreement on the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate, which was a principal objective of the RFI Foundation when it was established in 2015.
One success of Islamic finance in adopting responsible finance has been demonstrating the operational compatibility of ESG screening alongside the core mandate for Shariah compliance. A new position paper from the Malaysian International Islamic Financial Centre (MIFC) Leadership Council provides a vision for the next phase of growth and development of Islamic finance. This is one of several initiatives to more firmly establish responsible finance in its core.
There has always been a strong ground for Islamic finance to play a more active and leading role in addressing global needs to address concerns such as the climate and nature crisis. What has taken time since agreement around global goals for sustainable development and restoring balance in planetary systems has been to demonstrate compatibility of climate and ESG approaches with Islamic finance. By conclusively demonstrating this compatibility, Islamic finance has also illuminated opportunities for the sector to lean into its concern for equity and justice and provide solutions as the momentum of interest in responsible finance produces opportunities to feasibly put them into action.
What is holding back sustainable financial flows to lower middle-income countries?
At the end of April, the European Commission’s High Level Expert Group (HLEG) on scaling up sustainable finance in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) returned their final recommendations. These build on the position that public sector funding is insufficient to fill the US$3.5 trillion of annual financing for climate and nature risks and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and that private sector investment is required.
The volume of investment needed for these goals in LMICs in particular outstrips the public sector financial resources available either domestically or through international climate finance from developed countries. A large share of the international climate finance to meet climate and other sustainable development goals will need to come from private sector investors who have sufficient assets to fill the gap. However, these investors face numerous barriers that limit the flows of financing to LMICs that need it.
The European Commission’s HLEG on sustainable finance in LMICs acknowledged the gap between the current flows and what is needed and provided evaluation of several points where action could overcome them.
ICMA sustainable sukuk guidance brings flexibility and risks for issuers with limited green assets
The International Capital Markets Association (ICMA), Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) and LSEG have released guidance on sustainable sukuk, reflecting the growing contribution of Islamic capital markets to the wider sustainable fixed-income market.
Through the first quarter of this year, sustainability-labelled sukuk have been dominated by core Islamic finance jurisdictions including Malaysia, Indonesia, the UAE, Saudi Arabia and the IsDB, but the new guidance has been purposely developed for issuers coming from either sukuk or green bond markets to issue green, social, sustainable, transition or blue sukuk.
One of the areas on which the guidance is silent is the ESG/sustainability evaluation of the underlying asset, which is a structural difference between sukuk and bonds. The absence of guidance on ESG/sustainability screening of the underlying asset similar to what is required for the ultimate use-of-proceeds presents an area of risk that could be mitigated with clearer disclosure.
Even as it represents a risk to the sustainable credentials of the transaction if the asset's sustainability profile differs from investor expectations, it could be easily addressed with additional disclosure. This would mitigate the risks while providing flexibility for green and social sukuk where lack of green assets would otherwise create a barrier to issuers, especially in markets where a substantial share of financial assets are held by Shari'ah sensitive investors and financial institutions.